Human and infrastructural connectivity of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation: methodological approaches to research

The aim of the present paper is to introduce to the reader a new project “Arctic Connectivity: People and Infrastructures” (Russian Fund for Fundamental Research grant № 18-05-60108, received within the programme “Fundamental problems of research in the Russian Arctic: natural and social environment”). The three-year research project described in the article began in 2018 and is done by the Centre for Arctic Social Studies  (European University, St Petersburg). The approach is based on the central concept of connectivity. The main aim of the research is to study different kinds of connections that make possible movement of people, objects, and information both within the Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation (AZRF) and between AZRF and other parts of the country. The research uses holistic approach with its simultaneous and integrated attention to both social ties of the people who live and work in the AZRF and the physical infrastructure (roads and railroads, air and water transport, telecommunication etc.) that supports these ties. Despite the common stereotype, AZRF is not separated from the rest of the country. Multiple ties, both infrastructural and symbolic, unite the region by providing exchange of people, objects, and information between its parts, and link AZRF to the southern parts of the country. The target group of the ongoing research includes both indigenous and non-indigenous population. From the theoretical perspective, the research will help validate a working hypothesis of special importance of connectivity for the Arctic region. The research will help fill gaps in our fragmentary knowledge of the social life of the Arctic. From a practical viewpoint, the project will help plan the development of AZRF more rationally.

1. Elmsteiner-Saxinger G. Shift work: socio-anthropological study in the far north of Russia. Izvestiia vysshilh uchebnykh zavedenii. Sotsiologiia. Ekonomika. Politika. News from Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics. 2014, 4: 24–26. [In Russian].

2. Silin A.N. Mul’tilokal’nost’ obraza zhizni: opyt sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii. Obschestvo o sotsiologiia v sovremennoi Rossii. Multilocality of lifestyle: the experience of sociological research. The society about sociology in modern Russia. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference. Vologda, 2015: 41–44. [In Russian].

3. Sotsialno-demograficheskii portret Rossii: po itogam Vserossiiskoi perepisi naseleniia 2010 goda. Federanlnaia sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki. Socio-demographic portrait of Russia: According to the results of the 2010 All-Russian Population Census. Federal State Statistics Service. M .: Statistics of Russia, 2012: 183 p. [In Russian].

4. Karachurina L.B., Mkrtchan N.V., Abylkalikov S.I. Vnutrirossiiskaia migratsiia naseleniia. Glava 7. Naselenie Rossii 2015: dvadtsat’ tretii ezhegodnyi demograficheskii doklad. Domestic Russian population migration. Chapter 7. The population of Russia 2015: twenty-third annual demographic report. Ed. S.V. Zakharov. M.: NIU VShE, 2017: 309–332.

5. Heleniak T.E. The role of attachment to place in migration decisions of the population of the Russian North. Polar Geography. 2009, 32 (1–2): 31–60.

6. Larkin B. The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2013, 42: 327–343.

7. Simone A. People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public culture. 2004, 16 (3): 407–429.

8. Law J., Hassard J. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999: 264 p.

9. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: an introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007: 301 p.

10. Alapuro R., Bychkova O., Kharkhordin O. Infrastruktura svobody: obschie veschi i Res Publica. Infrastructure of freedom: common things and Res Public. St. Petrsburg: European University, 2012: 352 p. [In Russian].

11. Fucault M. Governmentality (the idea of state interest and its genesis). Logos. 2003, 4–5 (39): 4–22. [In Russian].

12. Gavrilova K.A. Temporal dimension of attitudes toward infrastructure and opportunities for relocation from the northern town: the case of Kamchatskii Krai. Sibirica. 2017, 16 (3): 35–56.

13. Gavrilova K., Vakhtin N., Vasilyeva V. Anthropology of the Northern Sea Route: introducing the topic. The Polar Journal. 2017. 7 (1): 46–57.

14. Migration Theory: Talking across discipline. C.B. Brettell and J.F. Hollifield (Eds.). New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2000: 239 p.

15. Saxinger G. Unterwegs: Mobiles Leben in der Erdgas- und Erdölindustrie in Russlands Arktis. Vienna: Böhlau, 2016: 227 p.

16. Habeck J.O. Does life makes more sense now? Young people’s life projects and the new feeling of stability in Russia. Folklore: Electronic journal of folklore. 2009, 41: 189–206. Available at: https://www.folklore.ee/folklore/vol41/habeck.pdf (accessed 29.08.2019).

17. Glendinning A., Pak O., Popkov Y.V. Youth, community life and well-being in rural areas of Siberia. Sibirica. 2004, 4 (1): 31–48.

18. Laruelle M.(ed.) New mobilities and social changes in Russia’s Arctic regions. Routledge, 2017: 216 p.

19. Levitt P., Jaworsky B.N. Transnational migration studies: past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology. 2007, 33: 129–156.

20. Greiner С., Sakdarpolak P. Translocality: concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography Compass. 2013, 7 (5): 373–384.

21. Zamyatina N.Yu., Pilyasov A.N. Concept of proximity: Foreign experience and prospects of application in Russia. Regional Research in Russia. 2017, 7 (3): 197–207.

22. Schiller N.G., Basch L., Blanc-Szanton C. Transnationalism: A new analytic framework for understanding migration. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1992, 645 (1): 1–24.

23. Kearney M. The local and the global: The anthropology of globalization and transnationalism. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1995, 24: 547–565.

24. Appadurai A. The production of locality. Richard Fardon (ed.): Counterworks. Managing the Diversity of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1995: 204–225.

25. Kaizer M., Brednikova O. Transnatsionalism i translokalnost’ (kommentarii k terminologii). Migratsiia i natsional’noe gosudarstvo. Transnationalism and translocality (comments on terminology). Migration and national state. Eds. T. Baraulinoi i O. Karpenko. St. Petersburg: TsNSI, 2004: 133–146. [In Russian].

26. Xiang B., Lindquist J. Migration infrastructure. International Migration Review. 2014, 48 (1): 122–148.

27. Zamyatina N.Yu., Pilyasov A.N. Sever, sotsialnye set ii ‘diaspora naoborot’. North, social networks and the diaspora on the contrary. Demoskop. 2013, 547–548. Available at: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2013/0547/analit07.php (accessed 27.11.2016). [In Russian].

28. Zamiatina N.Yu. Sotsialnaia lesotundra: geograficheskaia podvizhnost’ kak element semeinykh traektorii zhitelei severnykh gorodov (na primere Nokolska i Dudinki). Social forest tundra: geographical mobility as an element of family trajectories of residents of northern cities (on the example of Norilsk and Dudinka). Neprikosnovennyi zapas. 2014, 97 (5). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2014/97/15z.html (accessed 12.07.2019). [In Russian].

29. Torre A. On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transfer. Regional Studies. 2008, 42 (6): 869–889.

30. Torre A. Wallet F. eds. Regional development and proximity relations. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014: 392 p.

31. Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional studies. 2005, 39 (1): 61–74.

32. Kordonskii S. In reality and really. Logos. 2000, 26 (5/6): 53–64. [In Russian].

33. Carson M., Sommerkorn M., Vlasova T. A resilience approach to adaptation actions. Adaptation Actions for a Changing Arctic: Perspectives from the Barents Area. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). Chapter 8. Oslo, Norway, 2017: 195–217.