Algal communities of the waterbodies of Schirmacher Oasis, East Antarctica
https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2020-66-2-198-216
Abstract
In continental waterbodies of Antarctic oases specific algal communities are forming. The structure and dominating complex of species of this communities due to different distance from the seashore and latitude, the composition of the constituent rocks, altitude and the presence in the past of periods of contact with sea water is unique for different oases. It may vary in different waterbodies within one oasis besides.
Aim of the research is to describe different types of algal communities from the continental waterbodies of Schirmacher Oasis and it’s confinement to the different types of waterbodies.
Samples were collected from 173 waterbodies: 151 with stagnant water and 22 streams.
During the study 64 species of Cyanoprokaryotes were found, and this group usually dominated in communities. Also 14 most frequent species of Chlorophyta, 12 most frequent species of Bacillariophyta, 6 species of desmid algae, 2 species of Xanthophyceae, 1 species of Eustigmatophyceae were noted in benthos. Usually resting stages and in one case — life cells of Golden algae (Chrysophyceae, Synurophyceae) were found in mats on the bottom of big lakes. Plankton algae in most of the waterbodies had very low abundance and diversity and were strongly influensed by trophic level. Benthic algal communities were much more diverse and abundant. Eight sustainable types of benthic algal communities were revealed in continental waterbodyes of Schirmacher Oasis. Form, colour, and species composition of bentic films and mats strongly depended on temperature, conductivity and pH of the waterbody and its depth.
Keywords
About the Authors
S. V. SmirnovaRussian Federation
Svetlana V. Smirnova
Saint-Petersburg
O. Y. Chaplygina
Russian Federation
Olga Y. Chaplygina
Saint-Petersburg
A. F. Luknitskaya
Russian Federation
Aliya F. Luknitskaya
Saint-Petersburg
References
1. Verkulich S.R., Pushina Z.V., Tatur A., Gilichinsky D.A., Abramov A.A., Melles M. Late Pleistocene — Holocene environmental changes and diatom flora in the Schirmacher oasis (East Antarctic). Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki. Problems of Arctic and Antarctic. 2012, 2 (92): 23–41. [In Russian].
2. Pandey K.D., Kashyap A.K., Gupta R.K. Nutrient status, algal and cyanobacterial flora of six fresh water streams of Schirmacher Oasis, Antarctica. Hydrobiol. 1995, 299: 83–91.
3. Pandey K.D., Shukla S.P., Shukla P.N., Giri D.D., Singh J.S., Singh P., Kashyap A.K. Cyanobacteria in Antarctica: ecology, physiology and cold adaptation. Cell. and Molec. Biol. 2004, 50, 5: 575–584.
4. Richter W. Biology. The Schirmacher Oasis, Queen Maud Land, East Antarctica, and its surroundings. Ed. Bormann P., Fritzsche D. Gotha: Justus Perthes Verlag, 1995: 321–347.
5. Shukla S.P., Gupta R.K., Kashyap A.K. Algal colonisation of Schirmacher oasis, Antarctica. Fifteenth Indian Expedition to Antarctica, Scientific Report, Department of Ocean Development, Technical Publication. 1999, 13: 109–116.
6. Singh S.M., Singh P., Thajuddin N. Biodiversity and distribution of cyanobacteria at Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Acta Bot. Malacitana. 2008, 33: P. 17–28. doi: 10.24310/abm.v33i0.6964.
7. Huang J. P., Hoover R.B., Swain A., Murdock C., Andersen D.T., Bej A.K. Comparison of the microbial diversity and abundance between the freshwater land-locked lakes of Schirmacher Oasis and the perennially ice-covered Lake Untersee in East Antarctica. Proc. of SPIE. 2010, 7819. doi: 10.1117/12.863131.
8. Swain A.K. Bathymetry of Schirmacher lakes as a tool for geomorphological evolution studies. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 2017, 461, 1: 77–93.
9. Alexandrov V.Ya. The climatic conditions of the russian antarctic station and airfield “Novolazarevskaya”. Uchonyye zapiski rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo gidrometeorologicheskogo universiteta. Scientific notes of the Russian State Hydrometeorological University. 2014, 39: 109–119. [In Russian].
10. Simonov I.M. Oazisy vostochnoy Antarktidy. The oases of East Antarctica. Leningrad: Gidrometisdat, 1971: 176 p. [In Russian].
11. Hodgson D. A. Antarctic lakes. Encyclopedia of Lakes and Reservoirs. Ed. Bengtsson L., Herschy R.W., Fairbridge, R.W. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012: 26–31.
12. Kumar P., Shokri M. R., Mehrotra I. Eighteenth Indian expedition to Antarctica. Scientific Report. Technical Publication. Department of Ocean Development. New Delhi, India, 2002, 16: 273–292.
13. Verlecar X.N., Ingole B.S., Parulekar A.H. Characteristics of the freshwater lakes at the Schirmacher Oasis in Antarctica. Proc. of Workshop on Antarctic Studies. Ed. Dwivedi S.N., Mathur B.S., Hanjura A.K. New Delhi, 1990: 144–153.
14. Kaup G. Loads and concentrations of nutrients in the lakes of the Schirmacher Oasis in the season 1983/84. Limnological studies in Queen Maud Land (East Anlarctica). Ed. Martin J. Tallin: Academy of Science of the Estonian SSR, 1988: 66–77.
15. Ingole B.S., Parulekar A.H. Limnology of freshwater lakes at Schirmacher Oasis, East Antarctica. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. Part B. 1993, 59: 589–600.
16. Wysłouch S.M. To the knowledge of the microorganisms of the Neva Bay. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo Gidrologicheskogo instituta. Proceedings of the Russian Hydrological Institute. 1921, 1–3: 3–48. [In Russian].
17. Komárek J., Elster J. Ecological background of cyanobacterial assemblages of the northern part of James Ross Island, Antarctica. Polish Polar Research. 2008, 29, 1: 17–32.
18. Ellis-Evans J.C., Layborn-Parry J., Bayliss P.R., Perriss S.J. Physical, chemical and microbial community characteristics of lakes of the Larsemann Hills, Continental Antarctica. Arch. Hydrobiol. 1998, 141, 2: 209–230. doi: 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/141/1998/209.
19. Hirano M. Freshwater algae from Yukidori Zawa, near Syowa Station, Antarctica. Memoirs of the National Institute of Polar Research, Special Issue. 1979, 11: 1–25.
Review
For citations:
Smirnova S.V., Chaplygina O.Y., Luknitskaya A.F. Algal communities of the waterbodies of Schirmacher Oasis, East Antarctica. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2020;66(2):198-216. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2020-66-2-198-216