Uncertainty factor in contemporary communities of the Russian Arctic: methodological approaches to research
https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2022-68-4-420-436
Abstract
The article introduces readers to work on a new research project “Overcoming Uncertainty in Interaction with the Physical and Social Environment in the Russian Arctic” by describing its conceptual and theoretical approach and premises as well as the steps of designing it. It opens with an analysis of the concept of risk, which is currently popular in the Arctic Social Studies and which is sometimes claimed to be the central concept in the field. It proceeds by describing the new approach, which is based on the concept of uncertainty, both natural and social, which constantly accompanies human life in the Far North. The inhabitants of the North know from experience that uncertainty cannot be ruled out, but one can be constantly prepared for it by planning one’s behavior with this factor in mind. Furthermore, one can suggest that the effects of ecological, economic and social changes are experienced by these inhabitants first and foremost as shifts in the level and kind of uncertainty. Therefore, the concept of uncertainty can replace the concept of risk in the studies of the effects of change on northern communities; in fact, “uncertainty” is preferable because its conceived nature is obvious, while in many risk studies, risk is still perceived as something objective. The main questions that a study of uncertainty can answer are: what is the role of natural and social uncertainty in the everyday life of the permanent population of the Arctic? What are the action strategies of the people in the face of uncertainty, including discursive strategies to explain the growing uncertainty? What is the role of state authorities, industrial companies, local organizations, urban and rural communities in overcoming the negative consequences of natural and social uncertainties? How are social connections and networks involved in dealing with situations of uncertainty? The paper demonstrates how these questions can be answered on the basis of anthropological fieldwork. It also uses examples from the Komi Republic (Vorkuta), Yakutia (Chersky settlement), and Magadan area to demonstrate the sort of problems the uncertainty-based approach can contribute to solving. A review of the existing literature in Russian and English is presented in order to give the reader useful insights into the field of uncertainty studies and outline the main directions of research that a study of uncertainty can take
Supporting agencies: The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation within the framework of a grant No 22-18-00238, https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00238/.
About the Authors
K. V. Istomin
Center for Arctic Social Studies, European University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. B. Vakhtin
Center for Arctic Social Studies, European University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ulturgasheva O., Bodenhorn B. (eds). Risky Futures: Climate, Geopolitics and Local Realities in the Uncertain Circumpolar North. New York: Berghahn, 2022. 236 p.
2. Bravo M. Afterword: Risk Constellations and the Politics of Polarity // Risky Futures: Climate, Geopolitics and Local Realities in the Uncertain Circumpolar North / Edited by Ulturgasheva O. and Bodenhorn B. New York: Berghahn, 2022. P. 206–212.
3. Bodenhorn B., Ulturgasheva O. On Constellations and Connected-Up Thinking in the Face of the Future // Risky Futures: Climate, Geopolitics and Local Realities in the Uncertain Circumpolar North / Edited by Ulturgasheva O. and Bodenhorn B. New York: Berghahn, 2022. P. 1–25.
4. Douglas M., Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. 221 p.
5. Beck U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd., 1992. 272 p.
6. Chaney D. Lifestyles. London: Routledge, 1996. 196 p.
7. Zinn J.O. Introduction: The Contribution of Sociology to the Discourse on Risk and Uncertainty // Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction / Edited by J.O. Zinn. Malden: Blackwell, 2008. P. 1–17.
8. Samimian-Darash L., Rabinow P. (eds.) Modes of Uncertainty: Anthropological cases. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015. 251 p.
9. Crate S.A. Gone the bull of winter? Grappling with the cultural implications of and anthropology’s role (s) in global climate change // Current anthropology. 2008. V. 49. № 4. P. 569–595.
10. Anisimov O.A., Zhiltsova E.L., Zhegusov Yu.I. Public perception of climate change in the cold regions of Russia: the example of Yakutia. Led i Sneg. Ice and Snow. 2017, 57 (4): 565–574. doi: 10.15356/2076-6734-2017-4-565-574. [In Russian].
11. Anisimov O., Orttung R. Climate change in Northern Russia through the prism of public perception. Ambio. 2019, 48 (6): 661–671. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1096-x.
12. Anisimov O.A., Zhiltsova E.L., Shapovalova K.O., Ershova A.A. Analysis of climate change indicators. Part 2. Northwestern region of Russia. Meterologiia i Gidrologiia. Meteorology and Hydrology. 2020, 1: 23–25. [In Russian].
13. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values // Climatic Change. 2006. V. 77. № 1–2. P. 45–72. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9.
14. Pietsch J., McAllister I. “A diabolical challenge”: Public opinion and climate change policy in Australia // Environmental Politics. 2010. V. 19. № 2. P. 217–236. doi: 10.1080/09644010903574509.
15. Telešienė A., Gross M. How Green are Green Europeans? // Green European: Environmental Behaviour and Attitudes in Europe in a Historical and Cross-Cultural Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge, 2017. P. 1–11. doi: 10.4324/9781315648491.
16. Krupnik I., Rubis J., Nakashima D. Indigenous Knowledge for Climate Change Assessment and Adaptation: Epilogue // Indigenous Knowledge for Climate Change: Assessment and Adaptation / Edited by Igor Krupnik, Jennifer Rubis and Douglas Nakashima. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2018. P. 280–291. doi: 10.1017/9781316481066 3.
17. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. London: Routledge, 2000. 512 p.
18. Nakashima D., Rubis J., Krupnik I. Indigenous Knowledge for Climate Change: Assessment and Adaptation: Introduction // Indigenous Knowledge for Climate Change: Assessment and Adaptation / Edited by Igor Krupnik, Jennifer Rubis and Douglas Nakashima. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2018. P. 1–20. doi: 10.1017/9781316481066 3.
19. Boholm Å. The cultural nature of risk: Can there be an anthropology of uncertainty? // Ethnos. 2003. V. 68. № 2. P. 159–178.
20. Krupnik I. At the Frontline or Very Close. Living with Change on St. Lawrence Island, Alaska, 1999– 2017 // Climate and Culture: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on a Warming World. Edited by Giuseppe Feola, Hilary Geoghegan, and Alex Arnall, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. P. 168–187.
21. North D. Ponimaniye protsessa ekonomicheskikh izmeneniy. Understanding the process of economic change. Moscow: HSE Publishing House, 2010: 253 p. [In Russian].
22. Piliasov A.N., Tsukerman V.A. Arctic corporations and development risks: challenge and response. Arktika i Sever. Arctic and North. 2021. 44: 103–129. [In Russian].
23. Berthomé F., Bonhomme J., Delaplace G. Preface: cultivating uncertainty // HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2012. V. 2. № 2. P. 129–137.
24. Anderson B., Wilson H.F., Forman P.J., Heslop J., Ormerod E., Maestri G. Brexit: Modes of uncertainty and futures in an impasse // Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2020. V. 45. № 2. P. 256–269.
25. Cooper E., Pratten D. Ethnographies of uncertainty in Africa: An introduction // Ethnographies of uncertainty in Africa. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. P. 1–16.
26. Griffiths M. Living with uncertainty: Indefinite immigration detention // Journal of Legal Anthropology. 2013. V. 1. № 3. P. 263–286.
27. Johnson-Hanks J. When the future decides: uncertainty and intentional action in contemporary Cameroon // Current anthropology. 2005. V. 46. № 3. P. 363–385.
28. Rosenberger N. Japanese organic farmers: Strategies of uncertainty after the Fukushima disaster // Ethnos. 2016. V. 81. № 1. P. 1–24.
29. Button G. Disaster culture: knowledge and uncertainty in the wake of human and environmental catastrophe. London: Routledge, 2010. 312 p.
30. Samimian-Darash L. Practicing uncertainty: Scenario-based preparedness exercises in Israel // Cultural Anthropology. 2016. V. 31. № 3. P. 359–386.
31. Samimian-Darash L., Rabi M. Governing uncertainty, producing subjectivity: from Mode I to Mode II scenarios // Subjectivity. 2021. V. 14. P. 1–18.
32. Bird T. The creativity of everyday uncertainty: Improvisation, material security, and wellbeing in urban households in the Northeastern United States // Journal of Organizational Ethnography. 2019. V. 9. № 1. P. 1–16. doi: 10.1108/JOE-12-2017-0073.
33. Buchczyk M. Making certainty and dwelling through craft // Journal of American Folklore. 2020. V. 133. № 528. P. 178–192.
34. Honkasalo M.L. Enduring as a mode of living with uncertainty // Health, Risk Society. 2008. V. 10. № 5. P. 491–503.
35. Buyandelgeriyn M. Dealing with uncertainty: shamans, marginal capitalism, and the remaking of history in postsocialist Mongolia // American Ethnologist. 2007. V. 34. № 1. P. 127–147.
36. Calkins S. Who knows tomorrow?: Uncertainty in north-eastern Sudan. New York: Berghahn Books, 2016. 282 p.
37. Coope E., Pratten D. (Eds.) Ethnographies of uncertainty in Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 216 p.
38. Dungey C.E., Ansell N. ‘I go to school to survive’: Facing physical, moral and economic uncertainties in rural Lesotho // Children’s Geographies. 2020. V. 18. № 6. P. 614–628.
39. Verhoeven H. Climate water in a changing Africa: uncertainty, adaptation the social construction of fragile environments // Dædalus. 2021. V. 150. № 4. P. 260–277.
40. Kelly T. Documented lives: fear and the uncertainties of law during the second Palestinian intifada // Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2006. V. 12. № 1. P. 89–107.
41. Sosis R., Handwerker W.P. Psalms and coping with uncertainty: Religious Israeli women’s responses to the 2006 Lebanon war // American Anthropologist. 2011. V. 113. № 1. P. 40–55.
42. Burawoy M., Verdery K. (Eds.) Uncertain transition: ethnographies of change in the postsocialist world. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999. 330 p.
43. Shevchenko O. Crisis and the everyday in postsocialist Moscow. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009. 256 p.
44. Hébert K. Enduring capitalism: instability, precariousness, and cycles of change in an Alaskan salmon fishery // American Anthropologist. 2015. V. 117. № 1. P. 32–46.
45. Wentze S.I. State of uncertainty: educating the first railroaders in Central Sakha (Yakutiya) // Transfers. 2020. V. 10. № 2–3. P. 175–194.
46. Mozgovaya A.V. Identification, assessment and adaptation to risk under uncertainty. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika. Social Science and Social Praxis. 2019, 7 (4): 151–165. [In Russian].
47. Mozgovaya A.V., Shlykova E.V. Adapting to Environmental Uncertainty: Urban Resources. Logos et Praxis. 2019, 18 (3): 124–130. [In Russian].
48. Zorina A.E., Mozgovaya A.V. Workers in hazardous industries: environmental and personal factors of adaptation to social changes. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika. Social Science and Social Praxis. 2020, 8 (4): 54–68. [In Russian].
49. Mozgovaya A.V. Adaptation to environmental changes: risks of social and technological innovations. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal. Sociological Journal. 2021, 27 (3): 60–77. [In Russian].
50. Shlykova E.V. Subjective assessment of safety as an indicator of adaptability to the risks of social change: methodological and empirical substantiation of the research approach. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsial’naya praktika. Social Science and Social Praxis. 2020, 8 (4): 105–120. [In Russian].
51. Soldatenko S.A., Alekseev G.V., Ivanov N.E., Vyazilova A.E., Kharlanenkova N.E. On the Assessment of Climate Risks and Vulnerability of Natural and Economic Systems in the Marine Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation. Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2018, 64 (1): 55–70. [In Russian].
52. Davydov A., Mikhailova G. Climate change and consequences in the Arctic: perception of climate change by the Nenets people of Vaigach Island. Global Health Action. 2011, 4 (1): 8436.
53. Kattsov V.M., Semenov S.M. The second assessment report of Roshydromet on climate change and its consequences on the territory of the Russian Federation: General summary. NITS “Planeta”, 2014. [In Russian]. Available at: http://downloads.igce.ru/publications/OD_2_2014/v2014/pdf/resume_ob.pdf (accessed 20.11.2022)
Review
For citations:
Istomin K.V., Vakhtin N.B. Uncertainty factor in contemporary communities of the Russian Arctic: methodological approaches to research. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2022;68(4):420-436. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2022-68-4-420-436
Views:
436
Email this article 
