The choice of ice conditions for ice model tests to support the industrial development of the Оb’ Вay
https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2023-69-1-91-105
Abstract
The Ob’ Bay has long been the main center for the development of the Russian oil industry in the Arctic region. The rapid growth of shipping and the active creation of port infrastructure in this area are an integral part of the strategy for the development of the Russian Arctic. The main feature of the hydrometeorological regime of the Ob’ Bay is the annual presence of ice for a long time. Determining the ice performance of icebreakers, tugboats and heavy-tonnage vessels designed for the region, as well as ice loads on marine platforms and hydraulic structures, is a most important task in the creation thereof.
The paper describes research carried out in the ice model tank of the Krylov State Research Centre over the past twenty years. The research supports the design and operation of new technical facilities intended for the industrial development of the Ob’ Bay. In the completed study, two main areas of research can be distinguished, namely the interaction of ships and engineering structures with ice formations in the Ob’ Bay. The paper emphasizes a significant dependence of the possibility of conducting ice tests and proper analysis of findings on the quality of the initial data, primarily hydrology and ice parameters.
The results of ice model tests analysis, especially the ice impact on offshore and hydraulic structures for the Ob’ Bay, show the need to change approaches to determining theoretical ice loads and, as a result, to expand ice model testing programs. The simulation of the worst-case scenario, when all ice parameters are determined for a given probability and are not consistent with each other, leads to a significant overestimation of ice loads and the physical modeling of unrealistic combinations of ice conditions.
Each ice impact scenario should contain the maximum value of only one main ice parameter corresponding to the probability. The main ice parameters include the thickness, the flexural strength or compression strength and the speed of ice drift. In this case, ice parameters should be selected in accordance with the chosen main one in the modeling scenario. It should not be the result of the same maximum value calculation for the given observation period as for the main ice parameter.
About the Authors
A. A. DobrodeevRussian Federation
St. Petersburg
K. E. Sazonov
Russian Federation
St. Petersburg
References
1. Denisov V.I., Sazonov K. Е., Timofeev O.Ya. New experimental possibilities of Krylov State research Centre in ice interaction with marine structures researching. Arktika: ekologia i ekonomika. Arctic: ecology and economics. 2015, 3 (19): 76–81. [In Russian].
2. Sazonov K.E. Brash ice — a man-made problem of marine ice engineering. Priroda. Nature. 2022. 3 (1279): 15–26. doi:10.7868/S0032874X22030024. [In Russian].
3. Sazonov K.E. Ship operation in brash ice: results of investigations. Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2021, 67 (4): 406–424. https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2021-67-4-406-424. [In Russian].
4. Sazonov K.E. Modelnii i naturnii eksperiment v morskoi ledotehnike. Model and full-scale experiment in marine ice engineering. St. Petersburg: Krylov State Research Centre, 2021: 306 p. [In Russian].
5. Sazonov K.E., Dobrodeev A.A. Ledovaya hodkost krupnotonnajnih sudov. Ice performance of large-size vessels. St. Petersburg: Krylov State Research Centre: 2017: 122 p. [In Russian].
6. Coche E., Kalinin A. Yamal LNG: Challenges of an LNG port in Arctic. Proceedings of the 22nd International conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions. June 9–13, 2013. Espoo, Finland. 11 р. Available at: https://www.poac.com/Papers/2013/pdf/POAC13_172.pdf (accessed 15.03.2023).
7. Riska K., Blouquin R., Coche E., Shumovskiy S., Boreysha D. Modeling brash ice growth in ports. 22nd IAHR International Symposium on Ice. Singapore, August 11–15, 2014. Singapore, 2014: 853–859.
8. Andreev O.M., Gudoshnikov Yu.P., Vinogradov R.A., Klyachkin S.V. Ice channels as a limiting factor in the design of terminals for the shipment of hydrocarbons in the coastal zone of the Arctic seas. Vesti Gazovoy Nauki. News of gas science. 2019, 2 (39): 46–52. [In Russian].
9. Vinogradov R.A., Andreev O.M., Drabenko D.V., Skutin A.A. Engineering and hydrometeorological surveys taking into account the accumulation of ice porridge in Arctic ports. Prospects for the development of engineering surveys in construction in the Russian Federation. Materials of the 16th all-Russian scientific-practical conference of survey organizations. Moscow, 2021: 277–284. [In Russian].
10. ITTC — Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. Guidelines for Modelling of Complex Ice Environments. 7.5-02-04-03. 2021. 15 p. Available at: https://www.ittc.info/media/9661/75-02-04-03.pdf (accessed 15.03.2023).
11. Kazakov A.T. Safe distance and the choice of the optimal speed for icebreaking assistance. Aut. diss. for the competition uch. step. cand. tech. sciences. Leningrad, 1986: 24 p. [In Russian].
12. Sazonov K.E. Teoreticheskie osnovi plavaniya sudov vo ldah. Theoretical foundations of ship navigation in ice. St. Petersburg: Central Research Institute аcademician A.N. Krylova, 2010: 274 p. [In Russian].
13. Dobrodeev A.A., Sazonov K.E. Motion of heavy-tonnage vessels in the ice drift conditions. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. Arctic: ecology and economics. 2020, 2 (38): 68–76. doi: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-2-68-76. [In Russian].
14. Blagovidova I.L., Tertyshnikova A.S. Assessment of global ice loads on an ice-resistant fixed platform at the Kamennomysskoye-Sea field. Morskoy Vestnik. Sea Herald. 2020, 1 (14): 34–37. [In Russian].
15. Opasnie ledovie yavleniya dlya sudohodstva v Arktike. Dangerous ice phenomena for shipping in the Arctic. St. Petersburg: AARI, 2010: 320 p. [In Russian].
16. Dobrodeev A.A., Sazonov K.E. Physical modeling of ice load on extended hydraulic constructions. The vertical wall constructions. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. Arctic: ecology and economics. 2020, 4 (40): 77–89. doi: 10.25283/2223-4594-2020-4-77-89. [In Russian].
17. Dobrodeev A.A., Sazonov K.E. Physical modeling of ice load on extended hydraulic constructions. Sloping constructions with an inclined edge. Arktika: ekologiya i ekonomika. Arctic: ecology and economics. 2021, 11 (1): 90–100. doi: 10.25283/2223-4594-2021-1-90-100. [In Russian].
18. SP 47.13330.2016. Injenernie iziskaniya dlya stroitelstva. Osnovnie polojeniya. Engineering surveys for construction. Basic provisions. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/456045544 (accessed 15.03.2023). [In Russian].
Review
For citations:
Dobrodeev A.A., Sazonov K.E. The choice of ice conditions for ice model tests to support the industrial development of the Оb’ Вay. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2023;69(1):91-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2023-69-1-91-105