Preview

Arctic and Antarctic Research

Advanced search

Anthropogenic heat flux into the atmosphere and soil created by settlements located in the north of Russia

https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2025-71-2-123-146

Abstract

Estimates are presented for the share of anthropogenic heat flux caused by heating, based on assuming that anthropogenic heat flux depends on outdoor air temperature and that buildings comply with the thermophysical standards specified in the construction regulations. Using the OpenStreetMap web mapping platform, the Yandex Maps service, and GIS housing and communal services, building models were constructed of 12 cities and settlements located in northern Russia. The volumes of all buildings and the surface areas of their enclosing structures were calculated. Three algorithms for estimating the anthropogenic heat flux are considered. The first algorithm uses the concept of normative heat transfer resistance of enclosing structures. The second is based on the normalized value of the specific heat protection characteristic of a building. The third uses the normalized specific characteristic of heat energy consumption for heating and ventilation of the building. It is proposed to use the average anthropogenic heat flux estimate obtained by all algorithms. anthropogenic heat flux is estimated from an administrative and urbanized area. During the heating period the anthropogenic heat flux density from the urbanized area per 1°C difference between indoor and outdoor air temperatures ranges from 0.31 to 1.75 W/(m²·°C). The anthropogenic heat fluxdensity from the urbanized area for the average heating period temperature is located within the range where the lower boundary is estimated between 9.60 and 19.5 W/m², and the upper boundary between 30.0 and 61.2 W/m², depending on the settlement. In this case the total emitted anthropogenic energy (in PJ) from the administrative area is equal to 8.29–20.7 for Surgut; for Yakutsk 9.57–23.6; Arkhangelsk 7.37–15.4; Murmansk — 5.16–11.6; Norilsk — 2.99–9.09; Vorkuta, Apatite and Salekhard — 1.29–4.80; Naryan-Mar — 0.961–1.92; Dudinka — 0.537–1.42; Tiksi and Dixon’s — 0.247–0.681. The anthropogenic heat flux density directed downward toward the underlying surface during the heating season is in the range of 1.20–1.96 W/m². Values of anthropogenic energy averaged over the heating periods 2013–2018 and 2018–2023 are given. Maps of the spatial distribution of the anthropogenic heat f lux density for Vorkuta and Apatite are presented.

About the Authors

V. A. Frolkis
Voeikov Main Geophysical Observatory; Saint Petersburg State Economic University; Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Russian Federation

 St. Petersburg



I. A. Evsikov
Voeikov Main Geophysical Observatory; Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Russian Federation

 St. Petersburg



References

1. Будыко М.И. Изменения климата. Л.: Гидрометеоиздат; 1974. 280 с.

2. Van Deelen G. Another hot Arctic year indicates a new climate regime. Eos. 2024;105. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EO240566

3. Allen L., Lindberg F., Grimmond C.S.B. Global city scale urban anthropogenic heat flux: model and variability. International Journal of Climatology. 2011;31(13):1990–2005.

4. Li D., Wang L., Liao W., Sun T., Katul G., BouZeid E., Marong B. Persistent urban heat. Science Advances. 2024;10(15): eadj7398. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj7398

5. Пененко В.В., Алоян А.Е. Модели и методы для задач охраны окружающей среды. Ново сибирск: Наука, Сибирское отделение; 1985. 255 с.

6. Ginzburg, A.S., Evsikov I.A., Frolkis V.A. Dependence of the anthropogenic heat flux on air temperature (using St. Petersburg as an example). Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. 2021;57(5):461–471. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433821050066

7. Ginzburg, A.S.; Belova, I.N.; Raspletina, N.V. Anthropogenic heat flows in urban agglomerations. Doklady Akademii nauk. 2011;439(2):256–259. (In Russ.).

8. Makar P. A., Gravel S., Chirkov V., Strawbridge K.B., Froude F., Arnold J., Brook J. Heat flux, urban properties, and regional weather. Atmospheric Environment. 2006;40(15):2750–2766. https://doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.061

9. Offerle B., Grimmond C.S.B., Fortuniak K. Heat storage and anthropogenic heat flux in relation to the energy balance of a central European city centre. International Journal of Climatology. 2005;25(10):1405–1419. https://doi:10.1002/joc.1198

10. Varentsov M.I., Grischenko M.Yu., Konstantinov P.I. Comparison between in situ and satellite multiscale temperature data for Russian arctic cities for winter season. Issledovanie Zemli iz kosmosa. 2021;2:64–76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0205961421020093

11. Tarasova M.A., Varentsov M.I., Stepanenko V.M. Parameterization of interaction between the atmosphere and the urban surface: current state and Prospects. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. 2023;59(2):111–130. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433823020068

12. Jin L., Schubert S., Fenner D., Meier F., Schneider C. Integration of a building energy model in an urban climate model and its application. Boundary–Layer Meteorology. 2021;178(2):249–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00569-y

13. Frolkis V.A., Evsikov I.A., Ginzburga, A.S. Modeling anthropogenic heat flux during the heating season in large cities of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics. 2024;60(4):407–420. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433824700361

14. Frolkis V.A., Evsikov I.A. Estimation of anthropogenic heat flux during the heating period in cities of the Russian Federation with a population of at least half a million. Proceedings of the GGO. 2024;613:76–133. (In Russ.).

15. Chen W., Zhou Y., Xie Y., Chen G., Ding K. J., Li D. Estimating spatial and temporal patterns of urban building anthropogenic heat using a bottom–up city building heat emission model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2022;177:105996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105996

16. Evsikov I. A. Information technologies for calculating anthropogenic heat flux in urban areas. Vestnik NSU. Series: Information Technologies. 2024;22(2):20–32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25205/1818 7900-2024-22-2-20-32

17. Frolov K.A. Heat consumption of a cottage depending on its spatial planning parameters. Reliability and safety of energy. 2009;4(7):44–45. (In Russ.).

18. Podkopaeva E.V., Shekhvatova A.N., Semenova E.E. Study of the enclosing structures of public buildings. Engineering systems and structures. 2020; № 3–4(41–42):6–11. (In Russ.).

19. Belan B.D., Pelymskii O.A., Uzhegova N.V. Study of the anthropogenic component of urban heat balance. Optica Atmosfery i Okeana = Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics. 2009;22(4):441–445.

20. Dudorova N.V., Belan B.D. The energy model of urban heat island. Atmosphere. 2022;13(457). https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030457


Review

For citations:


Frolkis V.A., Evsikov I.A. Anthropogenic heat flux into the atmosphere and soil created by settlements located in the north of Russia. Arctic and Antarctic Research. 2025;71(2):123-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30758/0555-2648-2025-71-2-123-146

Views: 16


ISSN 0555-2648 (Print)
ISSN 2618-6713 (Online)